I try to refrain from getting too political here, but there is enough technology in this disaster and I feel strongly enough about it that I need to say something.
Just about every plan that BP has thought up involves recovering the oil. Are they more concerned about tapping the black gold or fixing the environmental disaster?
The expert’s long term solution requires a relief well to be drilled. Can we let another company start drilling this NOW? Why do we have to wait months and months for this to begin?
The US Government’s failure was due to them not enforcing or properly inspecting using current laws and standards. Why create new legislation or standards if we are not willing to enforce the ones we already have?
BP’s executives promised to pay for all the disaster recovery costs yet their liability is legally only $75 million. They have not addressed this obvious question. Do they have insurance? Are they prepared to pay above the $75 million cap, because it’s likely to cost more than 100 times that, and some things will be just impossible to fund enough to clean up.
What about economic losses years into the future as this mess spreads around Florida hurting their tourism industry and up the east cost disrupting fishing and tourism potentially for years?
What about economic losses for other countries such as Mexico whose government may not be as tolerant as the US government is by capping their liability?
What is the long-term danger of these chemicals that they are pumping into the ocean to break up the oil? Where is the openness and who is the oversight on this technology? If the oil is still in the water but we can’t see it, how does that help?
I work with computer servers and technology all the time for a large business. We have a contingency plan for just about every scenario including failures during a recovery operation. We won’t be causing ecological damage while we recover, but we will be losing money. BP is doing both right now yet no one thought about this possibility and developed a disaster recovery plan for the initial blowout or a contingency plan in case that failed? There are plenty of ways an oil rig like that could have been destroyed, many of which do not involve negligence of any time by the oil company or the government. Where’s the plan for this?
Why is BP concealing the extent of the spill?
Why are people still buying BP gasoline in the US today?!?!?
I believe BP is operating this cleanup effort with an eye on profits from the oil rather than the cost of the environmental disaster. This would lead me to believe that BP has no intention of paying the full costs of the cleanup and economic losses as a result because the cleanup will cost more than the value of the oil that has already spilled into the ocean. It would also then follow that if people would vote at the pump by picking other gas stations over BP until they fixed the problem that would speed up the time it would take them to fix the problem. I drove by a local BP station twice today and both times there were cars lined up buying gas even though there are stations nearby who are selling gas at the same, lower, or slightly higher prices. What sane American would purchase gasoline from BP right now? Why would you support a company who views profits above responsibility? I would understand if BP had lower prices and people needed to save a buck, but why do people get off the highway, drive past a cheaper Mobil station, and purchase more expensive BP gasoline? It makes absolutely no sense.
I know my audience is extremely limited, but please if you read this, don’t by gas at BP until they fix this problem. Please spread this message. I heard someone at church today who sounded like they were hearing about this problem for the first time. We need to get this message out or our complacency will allow BP to act in their own interests without consequences. Our votes as their revenue stream at the gas pump will matter more to BP than anything our government is likely to do to them.
The company I work for recently published a policy forbidding blogging while at work. From first glance this looks like a natural and normal thing – why should they provide resources to enable people to blog. Blog from home on your own time and with your own resources. At second glance this is a little scary for the paranoid blogger. Read the rest of this entry »
This month marks two years for my Vista install on my laptop. It is absolutely the best operating system I’ve ever used. Here’s what would have happened to me had I installed a different operating system two years ago:
Windows XP – the next logical choice: My laptop would have been reloaded 3 times since and I would be getting ready to reload again now. Most of my XP installations had to be reloaded every 6 months.
Linux: Month of my life wasted on emerge (if Gentoo). Months of my life wasted on troubleshooting hardware and getting sleep, wireless, etc, just right. Don’t get me wrong, I love Linux, but I’ve never had any success making everything work perfectly on a laptop, and by perfectly I mean that I can keep it running for a month without rebooting it – just putting it in sleep and hibernation when not in use.
I’m looking forward to upgrading to Windows 7 when it comes out. I’ve been running Windows 7 on another test machine at work and so far it seems pretty nice, and faster than Vista on the same hardware.
I’m having something happen to me that has never happened before. I’m getting bored with an install. Nothing is going wrong on my laptop. There’s nothing for me to tweak, nothing to fix, nothing I need to change. It just works exactly how I need it to when I need it to. Maybe it is time to start dual-booting something else.
I just saw an article on Wired called 8 Signs That Apple Customers Are No Longer Special. I am going to breech the Apple vs. PC subject here with my 2 cents. First of all, the article has some good points, but the larger picture is that Apple has fans that spend money on them rather than customers. Customers are a fairly loyal sort of people. You give them a good product at a good price and they will likely return when they need to replace that product. Even more, they will go out and tell their friends who they bought the product from and you can build a base of loyal customers this way. A fan on the other hand is fickle and moves on as soon as something better comes along. Apple’s “customers” are more fan than customer. Read the rest of this entry »
GM has halted work on the factory that is to produce the engine for the Volt. This is absolutely the last thing they should be doing right now. They need to commit 100% to the Volt at the expense of all else. I don’t care if they halt every other production line and sell every car on a lot for half price, they need to downsize and fully invest in the Volt. Their survival depends on it. This to me is just evidence that either GM has no idea what they are doing, or they are trying to manipulate the public into giving them cash so that they can continue working on the Volt. It’s time to take them over and hand off Volt technology to a company who will know how to build it properly and market it effectively.
I’ve written about the Atom processor and what it could do to save power if used in enterprise. Here are some things that I’ve done to save energy at home.
Replaced all my lights with CFL (Compact FLourescent) bulbs.
Replaced windows with triple pane vinyl.
Fixed the draft under the front door with a draft guard like you’ve probably seen on TV.
Replaced a 50+ year old boiler (in progress).
Reports on some of these are going to be subjective since I was not thinking at the time that I would be reporting on them, but I thought I would post this as an encouragement to some who may be thinking about undertaking a project like this.
It wasn’t too long ago that we had this little thing called the dot com bust. What if the government had bailed out the tech firms as they plan to do to the auto industry? Here’s a little glimpse into what our lives would look like. Read the rest of this entry »
I hate to make another post about Entrecard, but enough is happening there that I feel it justified. While browsing around recently I came across an article by impNERD about the problems with Entrecard. He has another post on the subject which describes many of the problems facing the community. In my opinion he is spot on with some of the problems identified, although I do not visit the Entrecard forums frequently enough to understand all the dissent that it sounds like there must be. Some of my suggestions are below.
I do not want to comment much about the credit crunch except as it influences technology. I wanted to bring a warning to people who use Vonage about something from my personal experience with VoIP. SunRocket went out of business suddenly and without warning leaving me and thosands of other people without service including 911. They managed to keep some people’s lines going from what I understand, but mine was immediately cut off. Vonage’s most recent 10Q talks about their debt and gives some warnings. If you have Vonage I encourage you to take a look at their investor relations pages and read this information for yourself. I’m not suggesting that they won’t secure the financing that they need to stay in business, I’m just giving a warning that you may want to do some research now on what you would do should your phone suddenly stop working. It was a mad rush to other VoIP providers when that happened, and I was already testing Packet 8 on the 30 day free trial, so I had it relatively easy.
Just at a minimum make sure you have a cell phone handy – even one without a service plan will work fine for 911 calls and won’t cost you a penny except to keep it charged.
On the same subject, you may want to look at other publicly traded companies that you do business with to see what their financials look like. I’m not suggesting you break off with Vonage or anyone else, because that will only increase the problem, just that you make the most of the resources that you have and make smart buying decisions. It is my opinion that this thing will blow over more quickly than most people expect, but more companies will go under before it is over.
I receive so many eWeek emails that it isn’t funny, and most of the time I have to just delete them because I don’t have time to even open them let alone read them. Recently however a headline What Is the Nature of an IT Worker? caught my eye. The article discusses, very briefly, a few of the common problems for IT workers and the things that cause those issues. For example, overworked, constant interruption, and a perception from others that they don’t understand the business. I can only speak definitively on my own experience, since I don’t want to repeat sentiment I’ve heard on the net, so here are my two cents.
Overworked
IT workers are the most consistently overworked individuals where I work. There are other groups of people who have projects or deadlines where they may work 50 hour weeks, but on average their numbers are much lower. I know of several individuals outside of IT who have claimed to work much more than they actually do, and I know people in IT who claim to work a lot more than they actually do. They are looking for the “sorry me” pitty that accompanies it, often to get out of doing something else. The cold numbers state that IT workers on average consistently work more than any other department. But not by much. So what is the real problem here? I have this posted on my name plate outside my cube:
The real problem is that IT workers are not properly validated for their work. When validation comes it comes in the form of more work. The harder an IT worker works, the more tasks and projects are given to him, which up to a point is a great thing and validates his career, but after a certain point causes burnout and a crash. I was in two meetings this past week with groups of individuals who had a specific job function. One was for UNIX administrators and one was for something dealing with security. In both groups I described my activities and breadth of work and was asked who was helping me. “I am the only one here who does this,” was my answer, which is completely true, “and these are only one part of the many things that I do.” I realized that a few of the people on the line had less work to do than I did, had help or a backup for that work, and that for all of them that single focus area was all they were expected to do. This is what I get for being good at the many things I do, and is also pretty much the only thing that validates me at work. That is the problem.
I called a co-worker at another office location this week as well and gave him a problem that I was having with something under his jurisdiction and he thanked me saying something to the effect that he was glad I called him and gave him a challenge. He was feeling like he needed a reason to be there for that day. In effect I validated him by giving him that task. Crazy! Yes, we IT workers are validated when you overwork us, which is probably why you do, but if that is the only thing you do then we will turn into the type of people who take baseball bats to computer equipment. Hint: Money is always good. Occasional comp time when projects are at a low point is also good. Emails to the entire organization about the next problem (keep reading) are also well received and is cheap.
Constant Interruption
IT workers are unique in this, and I don’t mean that no one else gets interrupted, but there is no other group who get less respect than IT. Just yesterday I was having a training meeting with the IT group to bring everyone else up to speed on an encryption project. Half the group got pulled away for “more important things” because apparently IT things aren’t important. While in the hour long meeting I was twice interrupted by an engineer who just had to pop in and have a question answered right that second. The non-work related questions also need to be taken outside of work hours. Just because I can fix your home computer does not mean that I want to, or that I want to hear about it and give you free advice.
I am also constantly doing projects – long term ones that can require a good 15 minutes of focus before becoming efficient. With the cube world being as it is I am constantly interrupted by a person walking up to my cube and stomping or scuffing his feet right at the end to announce his presence. Pretending to not hear the stomping and scuffing does not work. The questions are as often non-work related as they are work related, and rarely are they things that I will help them with immediately anyway. Between Wednesday and Thursday I was interrupted by one individual four times for a petty problem a computer illiterate contractor was having while trying to get on our contractor VLAN. That probably set me back an hour between those two days, and it is nothing that I should be doing – we have a help desk for that sort of thing, but they were out running about doing their jobs, so I got bugged. I won’t even mention the phone calls, or the constant meetings about having other meetings. You know what I’m talking about.
Perception from others as not knowing the business
This one gets IT people frequently although it is probably not as widely understood by those outside the industry. I saw it mentioned in the eWeek article which is why I mention it. IT people, especially ones that graduated with Computer Science degrees, often get artificially devalued for not understanding the business reasons for doing something. The thing is, it is often the exact opposite problem. IT people are forced to live to strict standards in large business IT and to provide a balance between many different forces. We live by Sarbanes-Oxley rules, legal rules, security standards, business needs, efficiency requirements, deadlines, budgets, equipment and software limitations, and quality standards just to name a few. IT people know better than most about the real reasons for doing things the way they are done. It is the non-IT worker who just ran out of hard drive space who wants to run to staples to buy another hard drive for $150 to fix our storage problems. They are the ones that don’t understand the business reasons for doing things. (Hint for those of you not in IT, a SAN is frequently used for anything mission critical, and it costs way more than $150.)
I speak from a biased standpoint since both of my degrees are Business degrees. I felt that it would be a waste of my time and money to focus solely on computer classes when I can just open a book up and figure something out. IT comes naturally to me. The Business is where IT really provides its worth. I do not have contempt for my CS brothers even if they tend to have contempt for me. I do believe that more IT workers should be business trained than CS trained, but most IT workers with Business or Science degrees who work in any decent size business environment figure out the business quickly, and usually know more about that business than most any one else there.
Entries (RSS)