Saw this article over on Engadget where HP thinks that changing the interface on Linux is equivalent to writing an OS. Original article with more details is at Businesweek.

Just want to clarify something here. RedHat is not an operating system. SuSE is not an operating system. Linux is an operating system. BSD is an operating system. Microsoft Windows is an operating system. If I skin Windows and add in some freeware applications it doesn’t make it a new operating system. I think Microsoft would have an issue with that. The only way people get away with saying things like this is that there is no one who controls Linux from a commercial standpoint.

It is intersting that they think they want to undertake the maintenance duties of developing their own flavor of Linux. I think they would be much better served by using SuSE or RedHat, or even Ubuntu. The major PC vendors have displayed many times that they can’t get open source right. In fact, one of the biggest gripes I have with Dell is that they charge more for their hardware if you buy Linux than if you buy Windows, and they don’t offer their higher end hardware with Linux. I’m the kind of person who always wipes a PC clean and reinstalls the operating system after I get a system, so it doesn’t matter much to me whether or not it comes with Linux, but I think there should be some kind of price break for not having to pay for Windows. Unfortunately it seems that the actual value to the big name PC makers is diminished by having Linux on the box. Apparently they get so many kickbacks from Microsoft that they subsidize the hardware. Right.

Anyway, this rant brought to you because an Operating System is different than a Theme and set of installed applications.